When purchasing cloud desktops, it's easy to get sidetracked by architecture terms like 'IDV, VDI, VOI'. For schools, the real questions to answer first are: Will it be stable on exam day? Can it be restored in 30 seconds after class? Will student assignments be lost? Can old computers still be used? Will teachers have an extra step during lessons?
School computer labs are not a single scenario; looking separately by course, exam, terminal, and network conditions makes selection much clearer.
In the same school, the answers for different computer labs may be completely different. When selecting a solution, it is recommended to first categorize the labs into the following types.
| Computer lab type | The most critical issue | Priority capability | Recommended solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard teaching computer lab | Many weekly courses, frequent software changes; teachers want to use them immediately at class time. | Image uniformity, schedule linkage, batch updates, electronic classroom software deployed with images. | Network/Semi-Cache Mode + Unified Image Management, first streamline the installation and classroom process |
| Exam Computer Lab | No lag, no data loss, no on-site dependency on server and network | Local cache, offline emergency, peripheral control, 30-second restore, fast rollback. | Full cache or local operation priority, conduct concurrent boot and failure drills before exams |
| Training / Design lab | CAD, simulation, programming, and graphics software are sensitive to performance and drivers. | Local CPU/GPU performance, driver adaptation, professional software compatibility, snapshot rollback. | IDV/Full-cache type prioritizes experience, do not fully push heavy loads onto the server |
| Mix with old computer labs | Large variations in machine age, hard drive capacity, and NIC quality | Heterogeneous terminal access, grouping by terminal, resume from breakpoint, use while downloading. | Multiple modes on same platform, good machines run full cache, light-load machines use network/half cache |
| Domestic (Chinese) / Linux Computer Labs | Mixed use of UOS, Kylin, Ubuntu, and Windows; teaching software must be deployable. | Domestic platform adaptation, Linux image packaging, Linux electronic classroom, unified management of teacher and student clients | Cloud Desktop + Linux Electronic ClassroomJoint acceptance testing to avoid a system that boots but can't be used in class |
These three items are more revealing of long-term risks than a parameter table and are also more suitable for pilot project acceptance.
Don't just look at single-machine boot speed. Observe whether the server, network, and terminals all remain stable when dozens of machines in the same switching domain boot simultaneously, restore uniformly, have peripherals disabled, or switch to exam desktops.
The system disk should be restorable, but student files should not be accidentally restored. It is necessary to confirm how personal directories, course resources, assignment submissions, teacher shared directories, and audit records are preserved.
Cloud desktop isn't about shifting problems from terminals to the server. Consider whether tasks like image updates, terminal grouping, timetable linkage, mini-program inspections, fault location, and batch rollback can be managed by just one or two people.
A truly practical system should not require teachers to temporarily switch desktops, install plugins, or search for resources every class. Electronic classroom, screen broadcasting, and assignment collection/submission should ideally be delivered with the image and ready to use.
The following is not about absolute superiority, but about helping schools translate 'technical terms' into 'computer lab consequences'.
| Selection items | Typical advantages | Typical risks | More suitable school scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDV | Desktop runs locally, performance close to physical PC, usable offline, more friendly for exams and practical training. | Traditional IDV often faces challenges with heterogeneous terminal image maintenance, driver adaptation, and bulk distribution pressure. | Exam labs, graphics training, design courses, labs requiring local performance and offline emergency capability. |
| VDI | Computing concentrated on the server, terminals are lightweight, data is centralized, facilitating unified management. | High server costs and network dependency; graphics/high-concurrency scenarios require careful evaluation of user experience. | Office, light-load, data strongly centralized scenarios, and the school already has strong server resources. |
| VOI | Centralized image management, terminals boot using a unified image, enabling higher efficiency in batch maintenance. | Concurrent boot and network quality have a significant impact; server or network anomalies will affect startup. | Standardized teaching labs, training labs, and light to medium load scenarios with relatively uniform terminal models. |
| Fuse multiple modes | Same platform supports network, semi-cache, full-cache, configurable by lab and terminal groups. | During pilot, design group policies clearly to avoid applying one template to all labs. | The real situation in most schoolsTeaching, exams, practical training, old machines mixed together |
Not about making schools bet on IDV, VDI, or VOI all at once, but about layering by lab, rolling out gradually, and managing uniformly.
Chengcheng vDisk adopts a centralized management, local execution approach, supporting multiple boot methods: network, semi-cached, and fully cached. Standard teaching labs can emphasize uniform images and rapid updates; examination and training labs can emphasize local caching, offline emergency response, and 30-second restoration. The cc-class electronic classroom software can be deployed with the image, eliminating the need for separate setup of screen broadcasting, monitoring, assignment distribution/collection, and classroom management.
For pilot projects, don't just look at the demo interface; at least run a real course, on real terminals, over a real network.
Separate teaching, exams, training, and legacy machines; don't apply one set of parameters to the entire campus.
Put both new and old machines in, especially test the oldest, slowest, most problematic batch.
Simultaneous boot, restore, and desktop switching; observe network, server, and terminal load.
Let teachers actually use screen broadcasting, monitoring, assignment distribution/collection, classroom software, and course resources.
Practice once for network disconnection, accidental deletion, image failure, exam switch failure, then discuss school-wide rollout.
These issues are recommended to be written into the pilot acceptance form, not just verbally confirmed before the meeting.
Look at the scenario first, not the terminology. For exam labs, practical training labs, design courses, and classrooms that need to work offline, prioritize local execution capability and local caching. For regular teaching, office work, and light-load classrooms, focus more on centralized image management, terminal reuse, and budget. Mixed schools are better suited for a single platform that simultaneously supports network, semi-cached, and fully cached modes.
The most common issue is only testing acceptance for regular classes, not for exam peak loads. It is recommended to conduct at least one drill for concurrent boot, unified restoration, peripheral disabling, emergency disconnection, proctoring mode switching, and rollback within the same floor or switch domain, to ensure exam day is not impacted by server, network, or image update failures.
The system drive must be clean on reboot, but student assignments and personal files should not be restored along with it. When selecting a solution, confirm support for personal data drives, cloud storage directories, assignment submission/collection, or course resource directories, enabling the system environment to be restored while learning data is preserved and traceable.
You can start with a tiered pilot based on CPU, memory, storage, network card, and graphics card capabilities. Light-load terminals can use network or semi-cached mode; heavy-load and exam terminals are recommended to use local cache or full-cache mode; do not use the results from one model classroom to directly roll out to the entire school.
Not recommended. It's better to consider the total cost over three years: server, terminal reuse, network upgrades, implementation training, operational manpower, exam risks, and subsequent expansion should all be included in the same budget sheet.
It depends on the mode. An architecture that fully relies on the central server is more sensitive to the network; solutions that support local caching, semi-caching, or full caching can decouple heavy loads and exam scenarios from network pressure.
The selection guide is responsible for determining the direction; the following pages are responsible for examining product capabilities, comparisons, and implementation combinations.
Look at the overall capabilities in teaching, exam, practical training, and multi-campus scenarios.
View solution →Understand architectural differences from runtime location, network dependency, performance, and O&M.
View comparison →Learn about network/half-cache/full-cache, multi-mode boot, timetable linkage, and mobile O&M.
Learn about product →Check screen broadcasting, monitoring, assignment collection/distribution, and Linux/domestic platform classroom capabilities.
View product →Send us the lab's purpose, terminal configurations, network conditions, and exam requirements. We'll provide you with a pilot list and mode recommendations based on the scenario.